Marivaux this is empty theatre Pierre Carlet de Chamblain de Marivaux(1688-1763). Was a French writer both to romance and theatre, some his comedy is very empty; he born in aristocratic family, during ancient regime, and before that French revolution, he tells every behaviour of aristocracy, with all his devoid, he to comedy of The tied, performed at 1736, he writes dialogues that are very empty, full of formal words and posture; therefore he describes life of higher class, that unknown condition of middle class, and common people; the France of revolution not was certainly poor, in conformity with opinion of Tocqueville, but needs alone political reforms for to give possibility to middle class, In fact French revolution was a long process begun by middle class; but we must consider that this think was unknown both Merivaux and aristocracy. Anyway this theatre is very useless, everything is worked with formal behaviour, and deep sense of comedy is lost among words and cutes ver...
Post
Epicurus a Socratic man Epicurus was a Greek philosopher, born in Samos around 342-341 before Christ, he attended school of Senocrates in Athens, and after he built his school in Athens around 307-306. Philosophical think of Epicurus has interpreted always as a search of pleasure and enjoyment, but it is not so, because with read of letter to Meneceus around happiness he shows a Socratic ground; we must consider that with Socrates an anthropological period of philosophy begun, and Epicurus on this letter he wrote: “The necessity is irresponsible, luckiness unsteady, but our will is free, and we can merit praise of reprimand”, I understand that this concept is very common today, but I want search origin of this concept that is in Socratic individualism, this is we can decide around all, in fact he wrote again: “The sage knows that is vain to believe that fate is owner of all, because everything happen to necessity or will of luckiness or to our will”, this last step is very important,...
Dialecticts A man was set on the chair at middle room, he turns around and looked some book on the table, he got up and red titles: Change , then he took this book and opened it, and he was very interested; a woman set on other chair in front of man, and she asked: “What do you are reading?”, and he without astonishment for this new presence, answered: “Do you know how much I was waiting you?” and woman: “No and I don’t give damn”, and man with a smile: “In conformity with rules of politeness a man must wait woman! I made it”, a woman: “In fact I am here now, but what do you are reading?”, and man showed title on the spine and woman: “Well but lacks my name”, and man: “What’s your name?” and woman: “Dialectics”, and man: “What is inherence between you and change?”, and woman: “Change is possible with dialectics alone!”, and man: “Why?”, and woman: “Because the dialectics is fight and contrast and in conformity with opinion of Hegel, the war is between two principles, and fight...
Pragmatic Hegelianism A man was reading a philosophical dictionary, and a woman approached to him and she asked: “What do you are reading?” and man answered “Dialectical life and how is possible translation of this concept in practical life, because to me it is very difficult”, and woman that while was set answered: “To be and nor to be to Hegel are in same spirit, because this encloses all, both positive and negative, therefore present and not present, all and contrary of all”, and man: “Yes, therefore?”, and woman: “In a man is all, because he has positive and negative, and he has ambitions and desire!” and man: “Yes, therefore?”, and woman: “If you want be very strong, while you are very weak, you have a negative condition, because you are very weak but you have desire to be very strong, therefore you have in yourself positive and negative, second is weak but first image of strong and desire to reach it, in yourself you have in same time positive and negative, contrast and effort ...
Marcus Aurelius the power of philosophical think Marcus Aurelius imperator of 2th century after Christ was an example of importance to policy, policy both during Roman Empire and after also; because he adopted his philosophical think and he mentions in his principal book, Memories, all his experience about philosophical think and what he has learned; in fact he employed much philosopher at his time and he written about his culture, but moral culture, and we must consider that word moral, is from Latin mores, this is behaviour and costume, therefore he writes about Rusticus(100-170 a.Ch.) stoic philosopher and master of Marcus Aurelius, Apollonius of Tiana and other. He mentioned them and he remembers that from Rusticus: “Make to me concept that my morals need of correction and culture, and I no must amuse to imitate Sophist philosophers and don’t write exhortative orations, so that I can excite stupor and success”, and after: “To leave rhetoric, poesy and elegant words as elega...
An American proustian Reading the The Great Gatsby of Francis Scott Fitzgerald published at 1925 in New York City is a romance of rich American life about twenties years, at last rich middle class, that is told with much particulars that have, in conformity with Hegelian philosophy, universal concept of everything; in fact description of these particulars is, certainly, an experience of read of Marcel Proust, and of his major literary work this is Recherché du temp perdu, published between 1913 and 1927, but at last six books of this work were published at 1925: Du côté de chez Swann, 1913, À l'ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs, 1919, Le côté de Guermantes, 1920, Sodome et Gomorrhe, 1921-1922, La prisonnière, 1923, La fugitive or Albertine disparue, 1925; these are six of all Recherché, that are almost contemporary and previous one than French period of Scott Fitzgerald, in fact he lived in French at 1920, same year of Le côté de Guermantes, and 1921, same ...
The origin of Feuerbach The think of Feuerbach above all about religion and his human atheism, he replaces theologian with anthropology, because he thinks that man has created God; this think is mere atheism but his origin is directly from Hegel and from German Protestantism; Hegel was protestant therefore believer, but Feuerbach employed some thesis of Hegel and he translated in his think: when Feuerbach spokes about difference between man and animal, he describes man as a being that has he and other, this is his essence and other man that is similar therefore he can speaks to himself because he is he and other person, that has same essence. The religion is identified by Feuerbach with consciousness and self-knowledge, this is consciousness of his essence; in conformity to opinion of Hegel self-knowledge is possibility to man of knowledge other man. As for object, natural object, in conformity of opinion of Hegel we have one first step with direct and sensitive knowledge, an exter...